Our Evolution is Futile
Ron Paul – The Debate
January 21, 2012Posted by on
Also known as “Typical Ron Paul Supporter”. Debate may go longer. I am in bold.
Ron Paul is to freedom is what the KKK is to tolerance
Care to elaborate on that?
Ron Paul believes that people should not be allowed to sue their employers due to sexual harassment. Ron Paul is fine with state sodomy laws. In fact, he’s pretty much willing to repeal all civil rights legislation and “let the states decide”. Except for flag burning, which he wants to ban outright.
I think you need to turn off your telescreen, and go graze outside for a while.
So you are saying that he does not support any of this?
You do realize you are a nanometer away from being completely and utterly owned?
The goat calls the other people sheep.
Haha oh no! Please provide your proof, smart guy.
THE GOOGLE! USE IT!
On Sexual Harrassment:
“Employee rights are said to be valid when employers pressure employees into sexual activity” “Why don’t they quit once the so-called harassment starts? Obviously the morals of the harasser cannot be defended, but how can the harassee escape some responsibility for the problem? Seeking protection under civil rights legislation is hardly acceptable.”
Yeah, most of this so called civil rights legislation is in direct contradiction to private property rights. Since your so good with google, you should use it to look up the word consent.
You are changing the subject. You said I was a “media sheep”. I provided my sources. Somehow I know more about your canidate than you do. If I am a sheep, then why is that?
How does that mean that you know more about Ron Paul than me? I agree with Ron Paul on all of those issues. You just like to distort them and make him sound bad. Liberty and freedom can always be made to sound bad by people like you. The world is a dangerous place and if you can’t handle it, that’s your problem, not mine.
So you believe that, if the only place you can possible employed, in this rough economy, sexually harrasses you, you must quit because someone else is violating your privacy? You believe that you are not allowed to burn the flag, despite the 1st ammendment? You believe that states can ban what sexual acts you do in private that harm no one?
Also, keep in mind that you were intially shocked by my allegations.
*and denied them.
If Ron Paul supported banning flag burning, then why was he opposed to Congress banning it? Also, why would you keep working somewhere if they were harassing you? Why on EARTH would you keep going back? The fact that you can’t find any other job is not anyone’s problem but yours. Life is rough, but that doesn’t give you any right to tell anyone what to do with their own private property.
“Consider the Lawrence case decided by the Supreme Court in June. The Court determined that Texas had no right to establish its own standards for private sexual conduct, because gay sodomy is somehow protected under the 14th amendment “right to privacy”. Ridiculous as sodomy laws may be, there clearly is no right to privacy nor sodomy found anywhere in the Constitution.
There are, however, states’ rights – rights plainly affirmed in the Ninth and Tenth amendments. Under those amendments, the State of Texas has the right to decide for itself how to regulate social matters like sex, using its own local standards””
“The CRA of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over the hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country. The result was a violation of the rights of private property and contract. The federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property owners to use their property as they please and to form/not form contracts with terms agreeable to all parties. (parts reomved folength
“The federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property owners to use their property as they please and to form/not form contracts with terms agreeable to all parties.” Exactly.
I say “Fuck that” for that part of the law, Ron Paul does the same for 1st ammendement rights, when it comes to burning the flag.
And it is easy for you to say that is right when you didn’t live in the 1950s south.
Actually, I misread his issue on Flag Burning: He introduced a bill to ban it, but voted against it. Kind of unorthodox, easy to misunderstand what he was going for. However, he does think that whenever or not the flags can be burned (and what you do in your bedroom) should be decided. What happened to the 1st ammendment?
Also, if every job employer decided to harass female employers, so they can’t get a job otherwise, you would do so under “liberty”?
Big jumble, due to how the system works, but it really shows the ideology of a Ron Paul supporter.